![]() ![]() Main article: Alternative terms for free softwareĪlthough both definitions refer to almost equivalent corpora of programs, the Free Software Foundation recommends using the term "free software" rather than " open-source software" (an alternative, yet similar, concept coined in 1998), because the goals and messaging are quite dissimilar. ![]() ![]() Some free software is developed by volunteer computer programmers while other is developed by corporations or even by both. ![]() įree software can be a for-profit, commercial activity or not. Beyond copyright law, contracts and a lack of source code, there can exist additional obstacles keeping users from exercising freedom over a piece of software, such as software patents and digital rights management (more specifically, tivoization). Users often may not reverse engineer, modify, or redistribute proprietary software. ( See also vendor lock-in and abandonware). Users are thus legally or technically prevented from changing the software, and this results in reliance on the publisher to provide updates, help, and support. Proprietary software uses restrictive software licences or EULAs and usually does not provide users with the source code. Software that is not covered by copyright law, such as software in the public domain, is free as long as the source code is also in the public domain, or otherwise available without restrictions. freeware or gratis software, which is a category of proprietary software that does not require payment for basic use.įor software under the purview of copyright to be free, it must carry a software license whereby the author grants users the aforementioned rights.Users cannot study, change, and share their source code. proprietary software, such as Microsoft Office, Windows, Adobe Photoshop, Facebook or iMessage from Apple.While this is often called "access to source code" or "public availability", the Free Software Foundation (FSF) recommends against thinking in those terms, because it might give the impression that users have an obligation (as opposed to a right) to give non-users a copy of the program.Īlthough the term "free software" had already been used loosely in the past and other permissive software like the Berkeley Software Distribution released in 1978 existed, Richard Stallman is credited with tying it to the sense under discussion and starting the free software movement in 1983, when he launched the GNU Project: a collaborative effort to create a freedom-respecting operating system, and to revive the spirit of cooperation once prevalent among hackers during the early days of computing. The right to study and modify a computer program entails that the source code-the preferred format for making changes-be made available to users of that program. Computer programs are deemed "free" if they give end-users (not just the developer) ultimate control over the software and, subsequently, over their devices. Free software is a matter of liberty, not price all users are legally free to do what they want with their copies of a free software (including profiting from them) regardless of how much is paid to obtain the program. Shown are the GNOME desktop environment, the GNU Emacs text editor, the GIMP image editor, and the VLC media player.įree software, libre software, or libreware is computer software distributed under terms that allow users to run the software for any purpose as well as to study, change, and distribute it and any adapted versions. An example of a GNU FSDG complying free-software operating system running some representative applications. For other uses, see Free software (disambiguation). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |